Aktionen

Lecture EWEA 2000 - Overview: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Transnational-Renewables

Zeile 20: Zeile 20:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[[Datei:Wp21-slide5.jpg|200px|verweis=Wind Power for the 21 Century - Slide 5]]
 
|[[Datei:Wp21-slide5.jpg|200px|verweis=Wind Power for the 21 Century - Slide 5]]
|2.) The Jamal Region with northern Russia. (The calculated production quite good compares with independent calculations of Risø et al. see REFERENCES [4] in the [[media:2000-10-25 Wind Power.pdf PDF Version]]
+
|2.) The Jamal Region with northern Russia. (The calculated production quite good compares with independent calculations of Risø et al. see REFERENCES [4] in the [[media:2000-10-25 Wind Power.pdf|PDF file]].
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[[Datei:Wp21-slide6.jpg|200px|verweis=Wind Power for the 21 Century - Slide 6]]
 
|[[Datei:Wp21-slide6.jpg|200px|verweis=Wind Power for the 21 Century - Slide 6]]

Version vom 3. Oktober 2010, 14:27 Uhr

Lecture Magdeburg [2001,en], Vortrag Lübeck [2006,de], Lecture Barcelona [2008,en], Vortrag EWEA 2000 [2000,en]
Vorstellung regenerativer Energien: Biomasse, Windenergie, Fallwindkraftwerke, Geothermie, Wasserkraft, Solarenergie


Slides of my speech @ Wind Power for the 21 Century

  • held on 25. september 2000 in Kassel
Wp21-slide1.jpg In my speech I would like to compare Intra and Extraeuropean options for an energy supply with wind power. I will give a short inside in the wind energy potentials and point out the change of the temporal behaviour if different catchment areas are used. Thereby we strive the topics of backup and storage needs and the subject of grid capacities. After this I consider wind energy as major source of power production. And last but not least I am going to reflect about a possible combination of climate protection and development aid.
Wp21-slide2.jpg Here you can see the potential production of wind energy calculated from data of the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecast expressed in FLH. Europe itself has good wind conditions. But its use is limited by the high population density. In a belt 4000 to 5000 km away from Kassel there are also very good wind conditions and in most of the areas the population density is 2 orders of magnitude smaller than for example in Germany.
Wp21-slide3.jpg If we now zoom in and have a view on Europe and its neighbourhood we find that the potential production within the shown area only considering Sites with more than 1500 FLH is about 100 times higher than the Need of the European Union and Norway. So it is possible to be quite selective and choose only the better regions. As an example I selected the following.
Wp21-slide4.jpg 1.) Good wind sites within EU & Norway. (With restrictions due to the high population density.)
Wp21-slide5.jpg 2.) The Jamal Region with northern Russia. (The calculated production quite good compares with independent calculations of Risø et al. see REFERENCES [4] in the PDF file.
Wp21-slide6.jpg
Wp21-slide7.jpg
Wp21-slide8.jpg
Wp21-slide9.jpg
Wp21-slide10.jpg
Wp21-slide11.jpg
Wp21-slide12.jpg
Wp21-slide13.jpg
Wp21-slide14.jpg
Wp21-slide15.jpg
Wp21-slide16.jpg
Wp21-slide17.jpg
Wp21-slide18.jpg
Wp21-slide19.jpg
Wp21-slide20.jpg
Wp21-slide21.jpg
Wp21-slide22.jpg
Wp21-slide23.jpg
Wp21-slide24.jpg
Wp21-slide25.jpg
Wp21-slide26.jpg
Wp21-slide27.jpg
Wp21-slide28.jpg
Wp21-slide29.jpg