Aktionen

Vortrag Lübeck 2006 - Folie 27: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Transnational-Renewables

(Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „{{Slide|LB2006-slide|de|27}}“)
 
 
Zeile 1: Zeile 1:
 
{{Slide|LB2006-slide|de|27}}
 
{{Slide|LB2006-slide|de|27}}
 +
Economically the option of wind power import is interesting even if new transport capacity is included.
 +
 +
* The Table shows cost calculations for the selected regions.
 +
* The underlying assumptions for the transport system and the wind parks can be found in the lower table. If you are interested feel free to come to me after this session.
 +
* As an example I now want to focus on Southern Morocco.
 +
* The mean potential production (in my conservative example) is 3400 FLH.
 +
* The costs within the region is 3 €c/kWh.
 +
* To transfer the power to Kassel a the length of a HVDC line would be 4400 km with 40m km sea cable.
 +
* The total costs in Kassel are calculated to be 4.5 €c/kWh.
 +
* Thereof 0.5 €c/kWh are due to the losses which average to 10%.
 +
 +
But not only the low population density and the low costs of imported wind power are notable - as shown – also the temporal behaviour of the power production changes with the size of the catchment area.

Aktuelle Version vom 3. Oktober 2010, 12:30 Uhr

Lecture Magdeburg [2001,en], Vortrag Lübeck [2006,de], Lecture Barcelona [2008,en], Vortrag EWEA 2000 [2000,en]
Vorstellung regenerativer Energien: Biomasse, Windenergie, Fallwindkraftwerke, Geothermie, Wasserkraft, Solarenergie
Prev.gif

LB2006-slide26.jpg

Übersicht

Anklicken für Druckversion

LB2006-slide28.jpg

Next.gif

Economically the option of wind power import is interesting even if new transport capacity is included.

  • The Table shows cost calculations for the selected regions.
  • The underlying assumptions for the transport system and the wind parks can be found in the lower table. If you are interested feel free to come to me after this session.
  • As an example I now want to focus on Southern Morocco.
  • The mean potential production (in my conservative example) is 3400 FLH.
  • The costs within the region is 3 €c/kWh.
  • To transfer the power to Kassel a the length of a HVDC line would be 4400 km with 40m km sea cable.
  • The total costs in Kassel are calculated to be 4.5 €c/kWh.
  • Thereof 0.5 €c/kWh are due to the losses which average to 10%.

But not only the low population density and the low costs of imported wind power are notable - as shown – also the temporal behaviour of the power production changes with the size of the catchment area.